The Apple of Knowledge: A daring new philosophy that explains reason, perception, and knowledge, using the Scientific Method and Empiricism. A book by an atheist believer. Soviet scientist provides a simple answer to complex life questions via an entertaining and thought-provoking dialogue with God. Mansourou criticizes religious concepts as vacant and limited in relation to modern, complex reality in this indictment of scripture and theology.
A humanist approach to meaningful living built on evidence-based truth, self-awareness, and core values like strength, kindness, and gratitude. Is it a rational choice or blind faith? Your answer will have a tremendous impact for your life and will shape the future of society. Did God Create the Universe from Nothing?: Did God create the universe from nothing, or could believers have it wrong?
What does science tell us? God, atheism or just admitting we don't know The Humanist Approach to Grief and Grieving. Humanism provides an excellent framework for coping with grief. It's a non-religious approach that will help you grieve and maintain your sanity.
The Atheist Afterlife: The Odds of an Afterlife Reasonable. the Odds of Meeting God There Nil.
Agio Publishing House January 19, Language: Related Video Shorts 0 Upload your video. Share your thoughts with other customers. Write a customer review. Read reviews that mention staume possibility science religious entirely speculative concept theory death arguments possible dualism physical consciousness atheists idea brain david questions therefore.
Покупки по категориям
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later. This is an intriguing book. A take on the afterlife without the dogma of organized religions -- or materialistic atheism -- is refreshing. Although I don't necessarily agree with all what's presented in this book, I think it is quite well-reasoned.
- See a Problem?.
- Product details.
- Jalna (Whiteoaks of Jalna series Book 7).
- The Atheist Afterlife : The Odds of an Afterlife - Reasonable, The Odds of Meeting God There - Nil?
Most atheists outright deny the possibility of an afterlife of some kind, but I don't think a lack of a God or gods necessarily means there is a lack of an afterlife. This book provides an alternative view to the often dogmatic, materialist views of mainstream atheism, regarding that subject. How he justifiably arrived at 4 is a little beyond me, saying only that it seems like we have 3 kinds of thoughts that make up our consciousness emotion and concrete thought, abstract thought, and intuition , and so therefore, the only logical conclusion, that is we go through phases of each turning ourselves "inside-out", first living and dying as a live consciousness as we know it, then progressively externalizing the other 3 in a process of reincarnations until we're completely "inside-out", and then the reverse till we're reincarnated in a new physical body, starting the cycle anew.
This conclusion, especially the insistence on cyclical reincarnation, never mind the rather arbitrary insistence on it being a 4 stage process, is entirely unsupported by the rest of the book, which lays out the speculative ground work for consciousness simply persisting after the death of the physical body.
He just jumps right into it saying, "obviously, life after death means reincarnation". There's nothing obvious about it. My second major objection comes earlier in the book, where Staume is first laying the groundwork for admitting the possibility of consciousness persisting after death by referring to the Law of Conservation of Energy, comparing consciousness to energy to say it never actually disappears, it just transitions to a different type.
If consciousness is energy in a manner analogous to how kinetic force is energy, then the comparison demands that just as kinetic energy transforms into heat energy namely, it is no longer kinetic , then cessation of consciousness as we know it would result in the "consciousness energy" would transition into energy that is no longer consciousness. This is the standard rebuttal to the "consciousness as energy" argument, and Staume makes no attempt to address it, treating the argument using the Law of Conservation of Energy as though it were a new one.
While there are other, smaller issues that I could nitpick, these two I considered to be the most glaring that prevent "The Atheist Afterlife" from being a genuinely thought providing text but rather a series of either previously rebutted or easily rebuttable arguments that conclude in a non-sequitur. I bought this book a while back. I must say that it as interesting read.
It suited me, because I'm not a very religious person. While it doesn't have a lot of science in it exactly, it tries to explain the idea of an after life with reasoning. Since nobody knows what happens to us when we die, what is contained in the book is somewhat speculative -- but the speculation makes you think and makes you consider various possibilities. The majority of the book hinges on the idea that our perception of reality changes when we pass on. We can go on into an after life, but in a way that is vastly different from what is taught by religion.
This is an interesting read for sure, especially if you are into philosophy. I enjoyed this book immensely as it provided a background to a question I have had for some time - do "God" and "afterlife" always go hand in hand, or were they strewn together over the course of history. And while the title of the book may be off-putting to some because it may be misconstrued as a thinly veiled pitch for religious beliefs, it is actually nothing of the sort. The book provides a basis for how and why some type of existence after death could be possible even in the absence of a Creator God.
Interestingly, I think this book also shows how the natural inkling that people have toward survival in spite of our death gives rise to God, a concept that still lacks real evidence.
1 701,71 RUB
Theists should not look at this book as selfishness without rules but atheists should also allow themselves to continue pondering existential questions. Because, God or no God, we all have them and we all strive for more knowledge.
After all, I was born and raised in a traditional Catholic home. A home where beliefs in an afterlife were based on Heaven and Hell. This book bases an afterlife on reason. The odds of meeting God there: It demonstrates that an afterlife is possible based on reason, and supports the probability of an afterlife with an original and testable support for dualism -- the proposition that our mind and body are separate.
An afterlife based on reason has profound implications.
- Pride and Prejudice - ILLUSTRATED;
- Fish Oil Amazing Health Benefits Explained: How Fish Oil Can Help You Fight Diseases, Lose Weight & More;
- Indias Partition: The Story of Imperialism in Retreat (British and Foreign and Colonial Policy).
- The Atheist Afterlife : David Staume : .
- THE MARRIAGE OF ESTHER.
- Welcome to Reddit,;
- Die Todesboten (German Edition).
- Customers who viewed this item also viewed.
An afterlife that requires only physics requires no God; it makes the concept of God irrelevant and removes the 'God of the Gaps' completely. It enables us to prove that many religious conceptions of an afterlife are false, including the concepts of judgement, selectivity based on belief, and the existence of Heaven and Hell.
The Atheist Afterlife - RationalWiki
It removes the concept of an afterlife from its religious associations, so humanists and other rationalists can examine it on its own merit. And an original and testable support for dualism could resolve a philosophical debate that's been going on for more than 2, years! He is a member of rationalist and freethinking associations, is studying at the University of London, and can be contacted via the website www.
Product details Format Paperback pages Dimensions x People who viewed this also viewed. Proof of Heaven Dr. Beyond Biocentrism Robert Lanza. Object-Oriented Ontology Graham Harman. The Poetics of Space Gaston Bachelard. Metaphysics of War Julius Evola. Introductory Lectures on Aesthetics G. Thus Spoke Zarathustra Friedrich Nietzsche. Being and Time Martin Heidegger. The Mystery of Things A. The Invitation Oriah Mountain Dreamer. Beyond Good and Evil Friedrich Nietzsche.
Peirce's Scientific Metaphysics Andrew Reynolds. God, Religion and Reality Stephen Clark. Timaeus and Critias Plato. Being and Nothingness Jean-Paul Sartre.